Introducing Mail Art: A Karen Elliot Interview with Crackerjack Kid and Honoria

Honoria
honoria@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu

 

 
Hubener: Karen Elliot is the founder of Plagiarism and the
     1990-1993 Art Strike.  Crackerjack Kid has been active in
     mail art since 1978 and is the editor of Eternal Network,
     an illustrated mail art anthology scheduled for publication
     in 1993 by University of Calgary Press.  Honoria, a.k.a.
     Mail Art Kisses for Peace, Touriste, and Fake Picabia
     Sister, hails from Austin, Texas where she is the MailArt
     editor of ND Magazine.  All three artists are active
     networkers who use both the international postal system and
     electronic mail links to distribute information, concepts,
     and sometimes a surprise wrapped in an enigma.

Karen Elliot (hereafter KE): Well, Crackerjack Kid, they say you
     compare mail art to Crackerjack candy--that you like putting
     a surprise in everybody's mailbox.  Who have you surprised
     lately, and who in turn surprises you most often?

Crackerjack Kid (hereafter CJK): I could say that nothing in mail
     art surprises me anymore, but it does.  D. Peepol of Akron,
     Ohio once mailed a lunch bag of black, sooty, perfumed dust
     and while I was opening it, the contents spilled over my lap
     onto the furniture and floor.  A small tag remained in the
     sack with the startling announcement: "These are the last
     mortal remains of my dear aunty Sarah."  Shmuel in
     Brattleboro, Vermont is only an hour down the road from me
     and yet s/he regularly sends add-on objects like driftwood,
     pistachios, walnuts, cryptic coded postcards, and most
     recently, a 3-D paper monoplane which arrived in an official
     plastic USPS "body bag."  Among the most unusal items I've
     mailed are navel stamps and a sourdough bread baguette I
     carved into a phallus.  I stuffed it into an oversized
     Crackerjack box for the John Bennett and Cathy Mehrl mail
     art marriage show.

(H)  One of the weirdest pieces of mail I received was a pop-up
     hand made splatter-painted paper sea skate from Kevin in
     Atlanta.  Somehow our correspondance evolved into sending
     each other fish.  It became pretty  challenging after the
     first dozen or so fish images.  He even sent me some cut out
     ads for efficiency apartments.  I sent him a photo of dried
     out, ugly as sin, cat-fish heads hanging on a Texas barbed
     wire fence.  I found a souvenir of Florid, a wooden paddle
     in the shape of a fish, the toy kind with a rubber band and
     ball attached.  I haven't sent it to him yet because our
     corresponding  fishing hole gradually dried up.  I still
     send him a bait fish every now and then and when he's in the
     mood (maybe now, after artstrike) he'll get a reel and
     flop some more fish on the postal scales.  Another long term
     correspondent in Indiana sends naive brightly colored
     drawings on envelopes with each letter.  One of them was
     called mother bar-b-ques the cat.  These don't have the
     verbal  shock value of Cracker's examples but if you saw
     them you'd agree on their dramatic weirdness levels.  But
     let me tell you about the most relaxing piece of mail I ever
     received.  It was from a correspondent in Oregon, a
     liscenced massage therapist.  He suggested flirtatiously
     that he and I engage in a mail fantasy.  I told him I was a
     prude but would have a fantasy as long as it wasn't a sex
     fantasy.  I told  him I could use a licensed massage
     fantasy.  He wrote back asking what scent of oil I wanted
     and what music.  I answered rose with a hint of citrus and
     that Mozart clarinet thing and he sent me a full body
     massage description in anatomical detail ending with a
     secret for turning on the parasympathetic nervous system and
     a $5 off coupon.

(CJK) Both Honoria and I could go on forever about wacky mail
     because the sacred and profane are so commonplace in the
     mail art mailstream.  There aren't any rules guiding what
     can and can't be sent.  Short of mail fraud, mailing bombs,
     drugs, or dirt from Canada, most everything gets posted.
     There was a mail art show in California with a conceptual
     theme titled, "Test the Post Office."  Objects mailed
     included an addressed water filled balloon.  Someone sent a
     fifteen feet long garden hose with over a hundred one cent
     stamps on the hose surface.  A sly mail artist tested the
     honesty of the postal system by laminating and addressing a
     ten dollar bill; it arrived safely for the show in Los
     Angeles.

(KE) You're planning on opening mail art here in this studio loft
     in SoHo.  So am I right to assume you're having a "mail art
     opening?"

(H)  Oh, most definitely!  The public will open the mail that's
     accumulated at this address over the past three months.  We
     decided to let the public take the unopened mail art off the
     walls and replace it with their own offerings.  There are
     tables all over the studio with materials for making mail
     art.  Our show, is just one of several dozen other mail art
     shows and projects which simulateously carry on every month.
     You can get the newest mail art show listings by writing to
     Ashley Parker Owens (73358 N. Damen, Chicago, IL 60645).
     Her "Global Mail" is a newsletter of international mail art
     events that's published three times yearly in January, May,
     and September.  There are numerous other trade zines,
     bulletins, and mainstream magazines which regularly post
     mail art show listings, but I'm most impressed by the sheer
     volume of projects and shows in her publication.  By the
     way, PMC readers can reach CrackerJack Kid via email (see
     list at end of interview).  He also edits a mail art zine
     entitled Netshaker.  Annual subscription is $12.00 payable
     by check or money order at PO Box 978, Hanover, NH 03755.

(KE) But where are the people you invited?  Aren't mail art shows
     supposed to be public events--places where mail artists can
     have a "coming out" and expose their secret, intimate,
     hidden mailstream corresponDANCES!

(CJK) Well Karen, I like how you accented Dances because that's
     just what mail artists do, they DANCE to an off-beat,
     underground chant called "Gift Exchange."  Someone once said
     mail art was Christmas in the mailbox everyday of the year,
     but we're here to let the public cut in on the dance.  Our
     show in part recalls the first mail art exhibition, The New
     York Correspondance School Show" curated in 1970 by Marcia
     Tucker at the Whitney Museum.  That show incorporated the
     work of 106 people, all individuals who had mailed art to
     Ray Johnson.  The irony was that Johnson's work wasn't
     present because he asked his correspondents to submit their
     work to him instead.  We've  invited everybody in New York
     City to this show who has the last name Elliot, or
     Johnson--in honor of you and especially Ray Johnson who is
     the father of mail art.  Of course anybody else is welcome
     to send mail art too.

(KE) Holy Akademagorrod!  Didn't Ray Johnson do that once--I
     mean, call everybody named Ray Johnson in the NYC phonebook
     to a New York Correspondance School Party?

(H)  Not exactly Karen, but Ray Johnson did have a "Michael
     Cooper, Michael Cooper, Michael Cooper Club."  There were
     two Michael Coopers who knew each other, and there was a
     third Michael Cooper that Johnson knew.  Johnson arranged to
     have all the Coopers meet each other.  Johnson has arranged
     a lot of meetings.  His mail art goes back to the
     mid-forties and quite a few people in the art and non-art
     world have had at least a mailing or two, fragmentary
     riddles that add to his mythic legend.

(KE) What does he mail?

(CJK) Cartoon characters like his bunny head, correspondence,
     mailings from previous works, and multilayered collages.
     Ray Johnson is a pun shaper who finds words within words and
     he's a master of wit who often mixes images with texts.  But
     the best way to experience Ray Johnson is to interact with
     him by dropping something in his mailbox.  His address is 44
     West 7 Street, Locust Valley, New York 11560.

(H)  Also, a lot of pictures of Ray Johnson are sent throughout
     the network with invitations to intervene upon them.  I
     received Ray Johnson's high school picture once from Italy.
     I cut it in half and put it in two TV sets and sent it back.
     How many Ray Johnson bath tubs are there?  That's a very
     popular project.  You usually add yourself to the zeroxed
     pile of networkers taking a bath with Ray Johnson.  One
     imagines the rubberstamp pad ink dissolving off the artists
     making a colorful bathtub ring.

(CJK) Ray Johnson is also notorious for his institutional
     inventions.  In the 1973 "Death Announcements" section of
     The New York Times, Johnson announced the demise of his New
     York Correspondence School, which was shortly thereafter
     reborn as Buddha University.  Numerous Johnson inspired Fan
     Clubs grew under the rubric of the NYCS.  I mentioned the
     Michael Cooper Club, but there was also the Shelley Duvall
     Fan Club, Marcel Duchamp Fan Club, the Blue Eyes Club and
     it's Japanese equivalent, "the Brue Eyes Crub."  Johnson's
     network of mail art contacts has expanded in recent years to
     include phone calls which range from informative to
     mysterious.  Ray called me one evening two months ago to say
     that the first New York Correspondence School meeting took
     place in a Manhattan Quaker Meeting House.  I was telling
     Ray how spirited mail artists interested me, mail art that
     shakes, rattles, quakes, and rolls--artists who I'm fond of
     calling "netshakers."  Johnson said his meeting at the
     Quaker House was just a meeting of friends, but he hoped
     that the people whould go into religious convulsions and do
     Quaker shaking.

(KE) I understand Johnson's importance to mail art, but is there
     an association between Ray Johnson and the selection of this
     space for your mail art show?

(CJK) Yes, in an oblique way I chose the NYC location over the
     Emily Harvey Gallery and Jean Depuy loft because this is
     where Fluxus master George Maciunas lived for awhile.
     Maciunas and Ray Johnson knew one another.  From 1960-61
     Maciunas ran AG Gallery at 925 Madison Avenue, a performance
     space not far from where we are now.  It's been said that
     SoHo started due to Maciunas's establishment of the first
     SoHo cooperative building at 80 Wooster Street.  Johnson
     performed a "Nothing" at Maciunas's AG Gallery just before
     it closed in July 1961.  Maciunas is credited as one of the
     founding members of Fluxus.

(KE) What's Fluxus?

(CJK) Dick Higgins, Alison Knowles, George Maciunas and a small
     group of artists started a new "tendency" or intermedia
     perception--George Maciunas named it Fluxus.  Fluxus implies
     "the state of being in flux, of movement, ephemerality,
     playfulness, and experimentalism.  This fluxattitude
     resulted in numerous publications, feasts, and Fluxfests.
     One of those performances occured here when Maciunas married
     Billie Hutching on February 25, 1978.  Wedding guests and
     the "wedding train," performed Flux Cabaret.

(KE) So Maciunas and Johnson were both Fluxus artists?

(CJK) Yes, although if Maciunas were alive today, I doubt he or
     Johnson would agree on any close interconnection through
     their work.  Neither Mail Art or Fluxus are movements as
     much as they are tendencies.  Maciunas, unlike Johnson or
     most of the Fluxus artists, had an anarchistic, utopian
     vision whereas Johnson's mail was actually correspondence
     art, an intimate, personal exchange between an individual or
     small group of people.  It was the American Fluxus artist
     Ken Friedman who took mail art out of the personal realm and
     into the international paradigm in which Fluxus artists were
     engaged.  Friedman's 1973 Omaha Flow Systems  established
     the mail art ethic for shows like this one we're having.
     Friedman brought his Fluxus background to mail art in the
     pursuit of open, democratic, interactive exhibitions which
     encouraged viewers to participate.  Interaction with
     audiences has always been a Fluxus characteristic.

(KE) Let's return to mail art shows for a minute.  What shows
     have you entered, Honoria?

(H)  My favorite mailart activity is entering mail art shows by
     submitting small pieces of art at the request of another
     networker in response to their chosen theme.  I ended up
     painting hundreds of postcard sized figures and skeletons in
     response to the shadow project(s) commemorating the people
     vaporized by the WWII atomic explosion on Hiroshima.  I put
     some of them on a black poncho and wore them to a Day of the
     Dead celebration in Austin and danced to cojunto music.  You
     never know where mailart will go or send you.  I used to
     work in an isolated and local competitive market (fine) art
     environment.  Now I feel the flow of art & ideas in and out
     of my studio room is part of a huge global art studio where
     we get together to gossip, philosophize, show each other new
     unfinished work, and communicate fresh ideas. The mailartist
     to mailartist communication uses all kinds of shortcuts that
     artist-to-general public, or even informed art historically
     astute public will not get.  Our jargon, in-jokes and
     creative playfulness are as slippery as freshly licked glue
     on the back of a 50 cent stamp about to be placed on a
     recycled envelope bound for Japan.  For instance, everyone I
     know outside the network thinks plagiarism is a naughty
     deceit.  Within the network Plagiarism is an art movement.
     In fact, there have been festivals of plagiarism.  Recycling
     other artists images is a basic concept in mail art.

(CJK) Appropriation, sorting, and shuffling written texts is also
     a very corresponDANCE kind of improvisational jazz you'll
     find in the mail art network.  Indeed, name sharing and
     detourning strategies began surfacing in mail art back in
     the early 1970s.  Dadaism, Nouveau Realisme, Futurism,
     COBRA, Fluxus, and Situationalism have all played varied
     influential roles in the mail art mailstream.

(H)  Now Karen, just between us girls, I want to know if you've
     been catching this drift?  I've noticed a renewed interest
     in the actions and representations of women in the network.
     Jennifer Huebert (POB 395, Rifton, NY 12471) just collected
     mail from women networkers who attended congresses in 1992.
     I'm looking forward to reading other people's views.  In a
     huge network full of pseudonyms and correspondents who don't
     speak each others languages I think it's odd, but fun, to
     examine the yin/yang aspect of it all.  One networker is
     named manwoman.

(CJK) Yeh, I know ManWoman!  S/he's a Canadian Pop Artist, a
     musician, poet, and a shaman who has an on-going project to
     restore the sacred, mystical significance of the ancient
     swastika--before it was denigrated by National Socialism.
     S/he believes in dreams and can analyze their symbolic
     significance.  When I told ManWoman that Cathyjack and I
     were trying to have a child, S/he sent me a fertility chant
     which, low and behold, WORKED within a week after I received
     it in the mail. That makes ManWoman more than just a
     charming individual--S/he's a very kind, gentle soul, a
     sage.  There's a certain charismatic aura and mystery in
     meeting such people through the mail--pseudonyms like
     ManWoman and Michael VooDoo help to create an unpredictable,
     unusual postal pantheon.

(H)  I have deduced from my correspondence that some mail artists
     perceive Honoriartist as a male.  Maybe it's due to my
     fertile imagination (although to my knowlegdge my mail has
     never been responsible for a pregnancy) plus my connections
     and art collaborations with transvestites.  Then there's all
     this  collaborating going on between many artists.  However,
     in the process of the historification of mailart someone
     will get interested in who is actually who and what sex they
     are.  I am quite content 2 be both or more.

(KE) I can certainly understand reasons for creating fictive
     monikers, but judging by both of your comments it seems that
     fact is often stranger than fiction in mail art netland.
     Now, on to a final question or two.  Readers of PMC  have
     seen sporadic Networker Congress and Telenetlink Congress
     listings in their electronic forum throughout 1992.  You
     (C.J. Kid) and Reed Altemus have called attention to
     yourselves as facilitators of these congress events.  What's
     this congress biz all about?

(CJK) 1992 was the year of the World-Wide Decentralized Networker
     Congress, otherwise known as METANET, or NC92.  The
     Networker Congresses were first proposed by Swiss conceptual
     artist H.R. Fricker in "Mail Art: A Process of Detachment,"
     a text presented in March 1990 for my book Eternal Network:
     A Mail Art Anthology (to be published in Dec. 1993 by
     University of Calgary Press).  In early 1991 Fricker met
     with fellow Swiss artist Peter W. Kaufmann and together they
     drafted an invitational flyer entitled, Decentralized
     World-Wide Networker Congress 1992.  The congress call went
     out to anybody, "Wherever two or more artists/networkers
     meet in the course of 1992, there a congress will take
     place."  The Networker Congresses, like the Mail Art
     Congresses of 1986, grew into a huge forum of 180 congresses
     in over twenty countries.

(KE) Sounds like an enormous project.  How was it organized?

(CJK) H.R. Fricker and Peter W. Kaufmann sought active, creative
     input from networker artists on six continents.  American
     artists Lloyd Dunn, Steve Perkins, John Held Jr., Mark
     Corroto, and I joined Fricker and Kaufmann early (summer
     1991) in the development of the NC92 concept and served as
     active "netlink facilitators."  Final drafts of the
     Networker Congress invitations included netlink contacts
     from Africa, South America, North America, Asia, Europe and
     Australia.

(KE) Is it fair to assume that the networker artist has grown out
     of the mail art phenomenon?

(CJK) I think so.  The Networker Congresses were based on the
     acknowledgment that a new form of artist, the networker, was
     emerging from international network cultures of the
     alternative press, mail art community, telematic artists,
     flyposter artists, cyberpunks, cassette bands,
     rubberstampers and stamp artists.  The year-long collective
     work by networkers of NC92 represents the first major effort
     among artists to cross-over and introduce diverse
     underground networks to each other.  Until this moment
     countless marginal networks, often operating in parallel
     directions, were unaware of one another.  Mail artists that
     network have a sense of what intermedia and interactivity
     involve--it's a consciousness which branches outward.  One
     could say that mail art's evolution was based upon
     intermedia--the mailstream merging of zines, artist stamps,
     rubberstamping, correspondence, sound sculpting with audio
     cassettes, visual poetry, and artists' books.  Communication
     concepts have been the medium and message that mail artists
     use to bind together these divergent forms of expression.
     Today, forms like stamp art have become genres unto their
     own, with proscribed criteria often veering towards
     normative art standards more than the spirit of a process.
     I read somewhere in Lund Art Press that the most successful
     intermedia forms eventually cease to be intermedia.  These
     creative forms evolve into the qualitative characteristics
     of techniques and styles and will finally become established
     media with names, histories and contexts of their own.
     Indeed, the rarity of mail may come to pass with the
     continued escalation of postal rates.  This may encourage
     more qualitative standards within the mail art network.

(KE) Well Cracker--Can I call you Cracker? (Crackerjack nods his
     head)--what's wrong with qualitative standards?

(CJK) Hey Karen, didn't you know that when you're really good
     they call you crackerjack?  Really though, for me, the
     thrill of the process is being inventive, taking yourself
     somewhere you haven't been before.  It can certainly go
     stale if you don't know when to let go, when to hold back
     from too much mail.  Burnout in mail art is rampant.  I'm
     not a statistician, but to get a focus on what my mail art
     activities involve each year, I set about tallying all my
     in-out going mail for 1992.  It revealed some startling
     figures to me.  Not including hundreds of email message,
     I've sent out over 1,150 mail art works and have received
     1,250 pieces in return.  These figures state that I usually
     answer most of the mail that I receive.  It also shows that
     with all of my international mailings, I spend, on the
     average, about $1.20 postage on each item of mail art I
     send.  That makes for an expensive passion!  I might want to
     cut back.  I might want to reconsider the investment of my
     time and energy, or I might decide to conserve the time,
     energy, and money for those I feel return the same
     intensity, joy, and playfulness of dialogue.  The bottom
     line is that there are personal criteria for entering and
     leaving mail art.  You definitely receive what you are
     willing to give and you quickly find out what your threshold
     for tolerance is.

(KE) Let's return to the networker congress concept.  What kinds
     of congresses were there in 1992?

(H)  I was invited to a place I'd never heard of called Villorba,
     Italy by a long time correspondent, Ruggero Maggi, who sent
     me some wonderful kisses when I did my kiss show.  I went to
     congress with the Italians and wow, am  I glad I did.  Long
     philosophical talks on the lawn of the beautiful Villa
     Fanna, videos of many networkers, performances, poetry,
     hours of exchanging, making, sending artworks, food, wine,
     joy, laughter, howling at the moon, walking barefoot in
     mudpuddles....  Well, you can just imagine it took the wind
     right out of my mid-life crisis.  This congress was
     dedicated to the great mail artist  A. G. Cavellini and they
     just made his archive into a museum.  We just don't have
     time to get into Cavellini and the philosophy of "don't make
     Art make PR" and self-historification etc..

(CJK) Among the scores of other congress themes were John Held
     Jr.'s Fax Congress, Jennifer Huber's Woman's Congress,
     Miekel And & Liz Was's Dreamtime Village Corroboree, my own
     Netshaker Harmonic Divergence, Rea Nikonova and Serge
     Segay's Vacuum Congress, Bill Gaglione's Rubberstamp
     Congress, Mike Dyar's Joseph Beuys Seance, Guy Bleus's
     Antwerp Zoo Congress, and O.Jason & Calum Selkirk's Seizing
     the Media Congress.  There were also numerous, on-going
     networker projects including Peter Kustermann and Angela
     Pahler's global tour as "netmailmen performers."  Throughout
     1992 Kustermann and Pahler travelled, congressed, lectured,
     recorded a diary, and hand-delivered mail person-to-person.
     Italian mail artist Vittore Baroni helped create and record
     a networker congress anthem, Let's Network Together, and
     American mail artist Mark Corroto produced Face of the Congress networker congress zine.

(KE) So how do you think all these NC92 congresses worked?  Did
     they succeed or fail?

(CJK) I think they were remarkable!  Most of the organizers of
     NC92 congresses have been active international mail artists.
     They have emerged from the networker year of activities with
     a deeper awareness of intermedia involvement in global
     network communities, and a realization that "I am a mail
     artist, sometimes."  While many mail artists visited friends
     in the flesh, others, unable to travel, "meta-networker
     spirit to spirit" in the NC92 Telenetlink Congress, a
     homebased telecommunication project conducted with
     networkers using personal computers and modems.  Serbian and
     Croat mail artists established networker peace congresses,
     one such congress taking place in a village where a battle
     raged around them.

(KE) Our on-line readers would probably like to know what your
     Telenetlink Congress was about.  Can you briefly state your
     objective?

(CJK) My objectives were to introduce and eventually netlink the
     international telematic community with the mail art
     mailstream.  I began forming an email list of
     telecommunication artists which I compiled from responses to
     my numerous NC92 Telenetlink postings on internet, BBS',
     electronic journals, and Usenet Newsgroups.  I began
     Telenetlink in June 1991 by participating in Artur Matuck's
     global telecommunication project Reflux Network Project.
     There I served as an active netlink between the telematic
     community on one hand, and the mail art network's
     Decentralized World-Wide Networker Congress, 1992.  Where
     these two projects intersected there were informal on-line
     congresses in which the role of the networker was discussed.
     Conceptual on-line projects such as the Spirit Netlink
     Performance drew in crowds of participants at the Reflux
     Network Project link in the Sao Paulo Bienale.

(KE) Haven't mail artists and telematic artists interacted
     through collaborative projects using mail and e-mail?

(CJK) It comes as no surprise that pioneering telematic artists
     like Fred Truck, Judy Malloy, and Carl Loeffler were once
     quite active in mail art's early years, but efforts to
     combine both mail art and telematic forms were never fully
     approached.  My Telenetlink project was the first home-based
     effort to interconnect the telematic and mail art worlds.
     By netlinking both parallel network worlds, I found many
     common tendencies; internationalism, interest in intermedia
     concepts, respect for cultural diversity, humor,
     ephemerality, emphasis upon process art rather artifact,
     humor, global spirituality unencumbered by religious dogma,
     utopian idealism, experimentalism, and interest in
     resolution of the art/life dichotomy.  Prior to Telenetlink
     there were mail artists such as Mark Block (U.S.), Ruud
     Janssen (The Netherlands), and Charles Francois (Belgium),
     whose efforts were aimed at introducing mail art through
     their own private Bulletin Board Services, but netlinking
     mail art and the telematic community through mainframes on
     internet hadn't been explored.  Fewer than four dozen mail
     artists are actively using computers to explore
     communicative art concepts, but that number is rapidly
     changing now that computer technology is more affordable.
     Still, some mail artists view their form as more intimate,
     tactile, expressive, and communicative than
     telecommunication art.  Other mail artists regard computers
     with mistrust, suspicion, even fear.  Likewise, I have heard
     telecommunication artists view mail art as a primitive,
     slow, outmoded, form of expression.  I prefer to think of
     telematic art and mail art as useful tools for creative
     communication.  It's not a matter of one form being superior
     to another.  I think the time is right for mail artists and
     telematic artists to get acquainted--to netshake--to
     telenetlink worlds.  Here's a list of telecommunication
     artists who use mail art and email as intermedia forms.  I
     think this is the best way Honoria, Karen Elliot, and I can
     help PMC readers learn about mail art--to experience the
     direct contact.

(KE) Well, I think that's a good way to come full circle in this
     discussion.  To know mail art and telematic art is to
     experience it.  Thanks Honoria and Crackerjack for opening
     up some possibilities to interconnect network communities.

 

Telenetlink contacts

 

      Reed Altemus:

IP25196%PORTLAND.bitnet

      George Brett:

ecsvax!ghb@uncecs.edu

      Burning Press:

au462@cleveland.Freenet.edu

      Anna Couey:

couey@well.sf.ca.us

      Crackerjack Kid:

Cathryn.L.Welch@dartmouth.edu

      Keith DeMendonca:

keithdm@syma.sussex.ac.uk

      FaGaGaGa:

ae705@yfn.ysu.edu

      Pete Fisher:

Pete.Fischer@stjhmc.fidonet.org

      Joachim Frank:

joachim@tethys.ph.albany.edu

      Bob Gale:

bgale@well.sf.ca.us

      Matt Hogan:

m91hogan.acs.syr.edu

      Honoria:

honoria@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu

      Hubener:

72630.2465@compuserve.com

      Judy Malloy:

jmalloy@garnet.berkeley.edu

      Artur Matuck:

am4g+@ANDREW.CMU.EDU

      Paul Rutkovsky:

prutkov@mailer.cc.fsu.edu

      Scot Art:

Scot.Art@f909.n712.z3.fidonet.org

      Uncle Don:

DPMILLIKEN@amherst.edu