Month: February 2014

  • One or Two Ghosts for One or Two Lines

     
     

    Tan Lin

     

       
    tall blank zebras appear
    
     
                  A
    To care. The aerogramme made a lily of necessity,
    stumped box, redolence ribboned far off in the glass
    cities I opened and closed to the dandy
    drawers. A colt emerged on a clotted pansy. A pan
    required fanning. This repose a thread files.
    Inside the spitting rope sweeps
    like a foppish knot or lighthouse,
    a beam where the sun withers like snow
    in its box of jewels. Like a towel-like now.
    
     
    
    tiny broom zippers boxed
    
     
                   Z
    Light as a ruler, I knitted the whiffing train to coverlet.
    Dark, I had my lips. They travel apart when I kiss.
    Exonerated groove. The captioned stock box
    waved to the master's bedroom.
    Clacked suds. All flaking tide and shout
    was music walking out a headlamp.
    Engined isthmus, emerged track of levels, it could be
    nice. The pubescent birdie sleeps
    in a closed head. So,
    it knows or it knows.
    A crumb held out a mighty
    citron in a beak, screwed backwards.
    But no ox sniffled to an owl
    or stockinged box strum through bedroom.
    

     

  • Two Poems

     
     

    Judith Goldman and Lisa Jarnot

     

    One

     

    And where did the Dutch get their vocabulary?
    A “generation and transition” company make the
    water muddy. Transitional generation in company
    of a muddy mere formality: or was it going Dutch,
    in transmission to transition? A mere formality of Dutch,
    a merely formal vocabulary, to be used “in company”
    of Dutch transmissions. My mission was to dutch
    a trans-generation, to formulate transitions.
    Or was it going muddy in the company?
    I threw mud at mimesis, a mere Dutch formality.
    And where did the Dutch get their vocabulary?
    Formerly, the Dutch kept company without vocabulary.
    My former mission was a mere formality,
    but I doubled my Dutch on the company’s transmission.

     

    Two

     

    Primitive haze or composite rejection?
    Such training requires persistence–
    a fateful hour, a stupid wheel, praiseworthy
    annals–the main term “reaction” would be
    retained, though searching for innocuous
    phenomena. It was not enough to have
    a patternbook, a dictatorship, or to claw walls
    looking for paint. Returning to the decoding end:
    you make it more cryptic. I’ll pant effectively.
    Roughly, in the rough, we are roughing it.
    This happens when I forget to differentiate–
    a false proposition of the first order.
    Or say: “When you hate maps, you hate the future.”
    Our lines are at stake in the border.